Ingredients supporting non-mesocyclone "landspout"
tornado events (summary
by Jon Davies)
( Case studies: 3 brief
case studies Paper on non-mesocyclone
tornadoes )
Strong>
Weak>
Most "landspout" tornadoes are relatively weak, but a few have been documented up to F2/F3 in intensity. Wakimoto and Wilson (1989) and others have identified the general processes and ingredients (see diagram from WW89) that appear to be associated with landspout tornadoes, a type of non-meocyclone or "non-supercell" tornado:
The boundary in these cases appears to be a crucial ingredient, providing focus and convergence along with vorticity. Such boundaries tend to be slow-moving or nearly stationary cool fronts that are weak with little temperature contrast, surface troughs, or topographically-induced convergence zones, and are often oriented NE-SW in some fashion. The wind shift across the boundary is typically from S or SW ahead of it to W or NW behind it, generating a sharp line of vorticity. In contrast, relevant boundaries for many supercell cases are often warm fronts or old outflow boundaries oriented W-E or NW-SE with winds shifting from S or SE to ESE or E across the boundary going northward, with storms crossing or paralleling the boundary rather than forming directly over it.
While little has been done in operational research to clarify the
thermodynamic characteristics of the environment near a boundary that would facilitate
rapid parcel stretching in low-levels for these cases (similar to dust-devils on a hot
day), some characteristics and general pattern features are suggested below that may help
in short-term identification of settings that can support more prolific
"landspout" events that involve multiple non-mesocyclone tornadoes:
<(composite example by Jon Davies)
The composite above drawn from several cases shows a typical boundary,
surface heat axis intersecting the boundary, and area of steep low-level lapse rates
(e.g., roughly 0-2 km or 0-3 km AGL) co-located with sizable MLCAPE and small MLCIN along
the boundary where storms begin to develop. The combination of steep low-level lapse
rates suggests a low-level environment conducive to enhanced stretching beneath updrafts
on the boundary with enough moisture depth and quality to reduce mixing and entrainment
that would otherwise dilute buoyancy of lifted parcels below cloud base. If all
these ingredients (the wind shift boundary, favorable low-level thermodynamic environment,
storms forming on the boundary) come together properly, landspout tornadoes may occur,
particularly where localized outflow intersects the boundary as storms evolve.
Southern-most cells seem to be favored, and tornadoes can occur rapidly and early in
updraft life-cycles as stretching intensifies. Awareness of these ingredients and
where thay seem to be coming together in some cases may provide heightened short-term
awareness to forecasters and warning meteorologists of an environment supportive of
non-mesocyclone tornadoes, not detectable using "typical" tornado forecast
parameters associated with supercells.
As further explanation of the enclosed blue area on the composite above, the following low-level thermodynamic characteristics appear to be important:
Such an environment (see example skewT) would likely facilitate rapidly rising parcels of air in the boundary-layer from afternoon heating, with little CIN to retard upward parcel acceleration in low-levels, enhancing stretching beneath updrafts along the wind shift boundary. A well-mixed depth of moisture in the low-level environment may prevent near-surface parcels from "mixing out" too quickly, helping them to retain buoyancy and upward acceleration.
These case studies and papers have examples of non-mesocyclone tornado settings, both tornadic and nontornadic, that may be helpful:
- 3 brief
case studies of settings with potential for non-mesocyclone tornadoes (2002-2004,)
- Tornadoes in
non-mesocyclone environments (NWA online paper by Jim Caruso and Jon Davies)
back to tornado forecasting overview page